Nurturing Economic Growth through Infant Industries

In the dynamic world of economics, the term “infant industries” carries significant weight, particularly when discussing the development and competitiveness of emerging economies or the birth of entirely new sectors. But what exactly does it mean, and why should businesses pay attention?

At its core, an infant industry is a new domestic industry that faces significant challenges in its early stages of development. These challenges often stem from the fact that the industry is not yet mature enough to compete effectively with established foreign counterparts.

Think of a fledgling tech startup in a developing nation trying to break into a market dominated by global giants, or a newly established renewable energy sector finding its footing against well-entrenched fossil fuel industries.

Why the Struggle?

Infant industries typically grapple with a range of hurdles:

Lack of economies of scale: New industries often have higher production costs per unit due to limited production volumes compared to established players.
Limited experience and expertise: Building a skilled workforce and developing efficient production processes takes time and investment.
Underdeveloped infrastructure: Inadequate transportation networks, energy supply, or communication systems can hinder growth.
Difficulty accessing capital: Securing funding can be a major obstacle for unproven ventures.
Intense competition: Facing established international players with lower costs, superior technology, and strong brand recognition can be daunting.

The Case for Protection: The Infant Industry Argument

This is where the “infant industry argument” comes into play.

This economic rationale suggests that temporary protection from foreign competition, through measures like tariffs or subsidies, may be justified to allow a nascent domestic industry the space to grow and mature.

The idea is to provide a “nursery” environment where the industry can:

Achieve economies of scale: As production increases, costs per unit fall, making the industry more competitive.
Develop expertise and innovation: Time allows for learning by doing, the acquisition of skills, and the development of new technologies.
Build a strong domestic market: Temporary protection can foster local demand, providing a stable base for growth.

However, it’s crucial to note that the infant industry argument is not without its critics and potential pitfalls:

The risk of creating inefficient “protected” industries: Without the pressure of competition, some infant industries may become complacent and fail to innovate or become truly competitive.
Difficulty in “picking winners”: Governments may struggle to accurately identify which industries have the genuine potential for long-term success.
The challenge of removing protection: Once in place, protectionist measures can be difficult to dismantle, even after the industry has matured.
Potential for retaliation: Protectionist policies can provoke trade disputes and retaliatory measures from other countries.

Relevance for Businesses Today

Understanding the concept of infant industries offers valuable insights for businesses, regardless of their size or location:

Identifying emerging market opportunities: Recognizing sectors in developing economies that are being nurtured as infant industries can present unique investment or partnership possibilities.
Navigating competitive landscapes: Businesses operating in or competing with infant industries need to be aware of potential government support and protectionist measures.
Understanding the dynamics of new industries: Even in developed economies, entirely new sectors can exhibit characteristics of infant industries, requiring strategic approaches to growth and competition.
Advocating for smart industrial policy: Businesses can engage in discussions about the appropriate role and duration of support for nascent industries.

The concept of infant industries highlights the delicate balance between fostering domestic growth and embracing the forces of global competition.

While temporary support can provide crucial breathing room for emerging sectors, it must be carefully designed and strategically implemented to avoid creating long-term inefficiencies.

By understanding the nuances of infant industries, businesses can better navigate the complexities of the global marketplace and identify both challenges and opportunities on the horizon.

—

Real-world examples help solidify the understanding of infant industries. Here are some examples from around the globe, showcasing both successes and instances where the “infant” never quite grew up:

A. Successful Examples (Often Debated in Terms of Long-Term Effects):

United States in the 19th Century: After gaining independence, the U.S. implemented tariffs on various manufactured goods, including textiles, iron, and steel. Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, explicitly advocated for these measures to protect nascent American industries from more established British competition. This protection is argued by some to have been crucial in allowing these sectors to develop their capabilities and eventually become global powerhouses.
Germany in the 19th Century: Similar to the U.S., Germany, under leaders like Otto von Bismarck, employed protectionist policies to foster its industrial growth in the late 19th century. Industries like steel and machinery benefited from these measures, enabling Germany to catch up with and eventually surpass Britain in certain industrial sectors.
Japan in the Post-World War II Era: After the devastation of World War II, Japan strategically nurtured key industries like steel, shipbuilding, and automobiles through government support, including subsidies, directed credit, and protection from foreign competition. Companies like Toyota and Nippon Steel, which initially benefited from this support, became global leaders.
South Korea in the Late 20th Century: South Korea’s rapid economic development, often referred to as the “Miracle on the Han River,” involved significant government intervention to promote targeted industries like electronics, automobiles, and shipbuilding. Policies included directed investment, export subsidies, and temporary protection from foreign competition. Companies like Samsung, LG, and Hyundai are testaments to the growth of these once-infant industries.
Taiwan in the Late 20th Century: Similar to South Korea, Taiwan strategically supported the development of industries like textiles, electronics, and later, semiconductors through a combination of state-led initiatives, investment in education and technology, and selective protection. This fostered the growth of globally competitive companies in these sectors.
Brazil’s Aerospace Industry (Embraer): The Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer is often cited as a successful example of an infant industry that benefited from government support and strategic focus. Initially a state-owned enterprise, Embraer received crucial backing in its early years, allowing it to develop the expertise and technology to become a leading global exporter of regional jets.
France’s Cotton Textile Industry (Post-Napoleonic Wars): Historical analysis suggests that the Napoleonic blockade, which disrupted trade with Britain, inadvertently provided a period of protection for the French cotton textile industry. This allowed the industry in northern France to develop the necessary skills and knowledge to become internationally competitive even after the blockade was lifted.

B. Examples Where Infant Industry Protection Had Mixed or Negative Outcomes:

Brazil’s Computer Industry (1980s): In an attempt to foster a domestic computer industry, Brazil implemented strict import controls for several decades. However, this resulted in a technologically backward and expensive domestic industry that lagged significantly behind international standards. Brazilian consumers and other industries that relied on advanced computing paid the price, and the sector never became truly competitive globally.
Malaysia’s Automotive Industry (Proton): While the Malaysian national car project, Proton, aimed to develop a domestic automotive industry, it faced challenges in becoming truly competitive internationally despite years of protection. Some argue that the lack of sufficient competition hindered innovation and efficiency.
Many Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) Efforts in Latin America and Africa: In the mid-20th century, many developing countries adopted ISI policies, involving high tariffs and other barriers to protect a wide range of domestic industries. While some initial progress was made, many of these industries remained inefficient, reliant on government support, and unable to compete in global markets, contributing to economic stagnation in some cases.
Nuclear Fusion Industry: While not a traditional “country-specific” infant industry, the decades-long effort to develop commercially viable nuclear fusion power could be seen as a protected infant industry on a global scale, with massive public funding and long timelines. Despite significant investment, it has yet to reach maturity and commercial viability.

Key takeaways from these examples:

Selectivity is Crucial: Successful infant industry policies often target specific sectors with high growth potential and clear strategic importance.
Temporary Nature is Essential: Protection should ideally be временным (temporary) with clear timelines and performance benchmarks to encourage efficiency and innovation.
Export Orientation Matters: Linking support to export performance can incentivize domestic industries to meet international quality standards and become globally competitive.
Broader Economic Policies: The success of infant industries often depends on complementary policies in areas like education, infrastructure, and technology development.
Risk of Inefficiency: Prolonged or poorly designed protection can lead to rent-seeking behavior, lack of innovation, and uncompetitive industries that become a burden on the economy.

These real-world examples illustrate the complexities and nuances of the infant industry argument.

While strategic and temporary support can foster the growth of competitive industries, poorly implemented protectionist measures can lead to inefficiency and hinder long-term economic development.